4588916d08
* Automated using `ssf-formula` (v0.1.0-rc.1)
160 lines
5.0 KiB
ReStructuredText
160 lines
5.0 KiB
ReStructuredText
.. _contributing:
|
||
|
||
How to contribute
|
||
=================
|
||
|
||
This document will eventually outline all aspects of guidance to make your contributing experience a fruitful and enjoyable one.
|
||
What it already contains is information about *commit message formatting* and how that directly affects the numerous automated processes that are used for this repo.
|
||
It also covers how to contribute to this *formula's documentation*.
|
||
|
||
.. contents:: **Table of Contents**
|
||
|
||
Overview
|
||
--------
|
||
|
||
Submitting a pull request is more than just code!
|
||
To achieve a quality product, the *tests* and *documentation* need to be updated as well.
|
||
An excellent pull request will include these in the changes, wherever relevant.
|
||
|
||
Commit message formatting
|
||
-------------------------
|
||
|
||
Since every type of change requires making Git commits,
|
||
we will start by covering the importance of ensuring that all of your commit
|
||
messages are in the correct format.
|
||
|
||
Automation of multiple processes
|
||
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
||
|
||
This formula uses `semantic-release <https://github.com/semantic-release/semantic-release>`_ for automating numerous processes such as bumping the version number appropriately, creating new tags/releases and updating the changelog.
|
||
The entire process relies on the structure of commit messages to determine the version bump, which is then used for the rest of the automation.
|
||
|
||
Full details are available in the upstream docs regarding the `Angular Commit Message Conventions <https://github.com/angular/angular.js/blob/master/DEVELOPERS.md#-git-commit-guidelines>`_.
|
||
The key factor is that the first line of the commit message must follow this format:
|
||
|
||
.. code-block::
|
||
|
||
type(scope): subject
|
||
|
||
|
||
* E.g. ``docs(contributing): add commit message formatting instructions``.
|
||
|
||
Besides the version bump, the changelog and release notes are formatted accordingly.
|
||
So based on the example above:
|
||
|
||
..
|
||
|
||
.. raw:: html
|
||
|
||
<h3>Documentation</h3>
|
||
|
||
* **contributing:** add commit message formatting instructions
|
||
|
||
|
||
* The ``type`` translates into a ``Documentation`` sub-heading.
|
||
* The ``(scope):`` will be shown in bold text without the brackets.
|
||
* The ``subject`` follows the ``scope`` as standard text.
|
||
|
||
Linting commit messages in Travis CI
|
||
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
||
|
||
This formula uses `commitlint <https://github.com/conventional-changelog/commitlint>`_ for checking commit messages during CI testing.
|
||
This ensures that they are in accordance with the ``semantic-release`` settings.
|
||
|
||
For more details about the default settings, refer back to the ``commitlint`` `reference rules <https://conventional-changelog.github.io/commitlint/#/reference-rules>`_.
|
||
|
||
Relationship between commit type and version bump
|
||
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
||
|
||
This formula applies some customisations to the defaults, as outlined in the table below,
|
||
based upon the `type <https://github.com/angular/angular.js/blob/master/DEVELOPERS.md#type>`_ of the commit:
|
||
|
||
.. list-table::
|
||
:name: commit-type-vs-version-bump
|
||
:header-rows: 1
|
||
:stub-columns: 0
|
||
:widths: 1,2,3,1,1
|
||
|
||
* - Type
|
||
- Heading
|
||
- Description
|
||
- Bump (default)
|
||
- Bump (custom)
|
||
* - ``build``
|
||
- Build System
|
||
- Changes related to the build system
|
||
- –
|
||
-
|
||
* - ``chore``
|
||
- –
|
||
- Changes to the build process or auxiliary tools and libraries such as
|
||
documentation generation
|
||
- –
|
||
-
|
||
* - ``ci``
|
||
- Continuous Integration
|
||
- Changes to the continuous integration configuration
|
||
- –
|
||
-
|
||
* - ``docs``
|
||
- Documentation
|
||
- Documentation only changes
|
||
- –
|
||
- 0.0.1
|
||
* - ``feat``
|
||
- Features
|
||
- A new feature
|
||
- 0.1.0
|
||
-
|
||
* - ``fix``
|
||
- Bug Fixes
|
||
- A bug fix
|
||
- 0.0.1
|
||
-
|
||
* - ``perf``
|
||
- Performance Improvements
|
||
- A code change that improves performance
|
||
- 0.0.1
|
||
-
|
||
* - ``refactor``
|
||
- Code Refactoring
|
||
- A code change that neither fixes a bug nor adds a feature
|
||
- –
|
||
- 0.0.1
|
||
* - ``revert``
|
||
- Reverts
|
||
- A commit used to revert a previous commit
|
||
- –
|
||
- 0.0.1
|
||
* - ``style``
|
||
- Styles
|
||
- Changes that do not affect the meaning of the code (white-space,
|
||
formatting, missing semi-colons, etc.)
|
||
- –
|
||
- 0.0.1
|
||
* - ``test``
|
||
- Tests
|
||
- Adding missing or correcting existing tests
|
||
- –
|
||
- 0.0.1
|
||
|
||
Use ``BREAKING CHANGE`` to trigger a ``major`` version change
|
||
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
||
|
||
Adding ``BREAKING CHANGE`` to the footer of the extended description of the commit message will **always** trigger a ``major`` version change, no matter which type has been used.
|
||
This will be appended to the changelog and release notes as well.
|
||
To preserve good formatting of these notes, the following format is prescribed:
|
||
|
||
* ``BREAKING CHANGE: <explanation in paragraph format>.``
|
||
|
||
An example of that:
|
||
|
||
.. code-block:: git
|
||
|
||
...
|
||
|
||
BREAKING CHANGE: With the removal of all of the `.sls` files under
|
||
`template package`, this formula no longer supports the installation of
|
||
packages.
|
||
|