Mikaela
/
mikaela.github.io
mirror of https://github.com/mikaela/mikaela.github.io/
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Projects Releases Wiki Activity
mikaela.github.io/blog/_posts/2024-05-22-policy-contentbl...

478 lines
20 KiB
Markdown
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters

This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.

---
layout: post
title: "Browser policies Ⅱ: Deploying PrivacyBadger and uBlock Origin"
category: [english]
tags: [firefox, chromium, browsers, browser, policy]
redirect_from:
- /privacybadger.html
- /ublockorigin.html
- /https2.html
lang: en
robots: noai
---
_I previously wrote about enforcing HTTPS for all users/profiles through browser
policy receiving some positive feedback and I felt like continuing on the
subject by instructing with extension installation. This barely scratches the
surface of what browser policy can do for you either though._
I recommend reading the [browser policy part Ⅰ on enforcing HTTPS
only mode]({% post_url blog/2024-05-17-https-everywhere %}) as especially the
Firefox part will continue building on it and I will try to not repeat myself,
although that is unavoidable.
<!-- editorconfig-checker-disable -->
<!-- prettier-ignore-start -->
<!-- START doctoc generated TOC please keep comment here to allow auto update -->
<!-- DON'T EDIT THIS SECTION, INSTEAD RE-RUN doctoc TO UPDATE -->
<em lang="fi">Automaattinen sisällysluettelo</em> / <em lang="en">Automatically generated Table of Contents</em>
- [Chromium](#chromium)
- [`/etc/opt/chromium/policies/managed/aminda-extensions.json`](#etcoptchromiumpoliciesmanagedaminda-extensionsjson)
- [Firefox](#firefox)
- [Answers to potential questions](#answers-to-potential-questions)
- [Where can I see what policies extensions can take?](#where-can-i-see-what-policies-extensions-can-take)
- [Why both PrivacyBadger and uBlock Origin?](#why-both-privacybadger-and-ublock-origin)
- [Why EFF DNT allowlist?](#why-eff-dnt-allowlist)
- [Where did uBlock Origin Lite come from?](#where-did-ublock-origin-lite-come-from)
- [How do I enable more default lists in uBlock Origin?](#how-do-i-enable-more-default-lists-in-ublock-origin)
- [What do you think about this blog post?](#what-do-you-think-about-this-blog-post)
- [Will there be browser policies part Ⅲ?](#will-there-be-browser-policies-part-%E2%85%B2)
- [Where is all the futher reading?](#where-is-all-the-futher-reading)
<!-- END doctoc generated TOC please keep comment here to allow auto update -->
<!-- prettier-ignore-end -->
<!-- editorconfig-checker-enable -->
## Chromium
[I previously instructed with the directory creation and permissions in the
part Ⅰ]({% post_url blog/2024-05-17-https-everywhere %}#chromium) and there I
also mentioned loving how I can create separate files there as opposed to
messing everything together. I tend to use the filename `aminda-extensions.json`
for all extension related as Chromium isn't perfect either and only lets the
options appear once.
So the file may look a bit scary, but it's actually quite simple (and the
difficulty comes from getting json formatted correctly, which I am leaving for
`pretty-format-json` pre-commit hook), so I am going to explain everything
before the actual json:
The `3rdparty` and `extensions` let us configure extensions in advance.
`cjpalhdlnbpafiamejdnhcphjbkeiagm` is the ID of uBlock Origin from Chrome Web
store which can be seen from its URL:
`https://chromewebstore.google.com/detail/ublock-origin/cjpalhdlnbpafiamejdnhcphjbkeiagm`
and everything specified here will become a part of it's
configuration.`trustedSiteDirective` means the sites it will be disabld on, the
extension pages are recommended in the documentation and I don't mind Ecosia
displaying ads since they go to planting trees. Note that the user can add their
own sites or remove these from the extension settings.
`toOverwrite` says clearly it will overwrite user settings, so the lists
everyone on your system wishes to use should be specified here. In this case,
this contains the default lists, the Finnish adblocking list and the quick fixes
list, which updates more rapidly in cases such as the cat-and-mouse with YouTube
and adblockers.
There is also the EFF DNT allowlist which was introduced to me by [AdNauseam].
You have most likely heard of how ads let content to be free and supports
content creators and all that, I don't want to take away their revenue, but I
don't want to risk targeted malvertising or manipulation either, so this is my
compromise. Respect my privacy, and I will see your ads, or be blocked.
Onwards to [PrivacyBadger], the ID again comes from Chrome Web Store URL
`https://chromewebstore.google.com/detail/privacy-badger/pkehgijcmpdhfbdbbnkijodmdjhbjlgp`
and the settings are clear on what they do. If they are removed, it's up to the
default value or user configuration what will happen.
This [PrivacyBadger] configuration will simply always set these options on
browser start:
- `"checkForDNTPolicy": true` check if the domain has a
[`.well-known/dnt-policy.txt`](https://www.eff.org/dnt-policy) and if so,
won't block it.
- `"disabledSites": []` configures the domains that are allowed to perform
tracking/disrespect DNT. While here it's the same as with uBlock Origin, in my
actual policies I allowlist domains more freely in uBlock Origin than
[PrivacyBadger].
- `"learnInIncognito": true`
[**_WARNING! May make you more trackable_**](https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2020/10/privacy-badger-changing-protect-you-better)
Same as below, but in incognito mode.
- `"learnLocally": true`
[**_WARNING! May make you more trackable_**](https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2020/10/privacy-badger-changing-protect-you-better)
[PrivacyBadger] has rare ability to learn who tracks you without having to ask
anywhere else, so with this enabled, it may block something before it gets
added to either the premade list or something uBlock Origin has.
- `"sendDNTSignal": true` Whether or not to configure the web browser to send Do
Not Track and Global Privacy Control signals.
- `"showCounter": true` Whether to display the number of blocked trackers in the
[PrivacyBadger] icon.
- `"showIntroPage": false` Whether or not to display the welcome to
PrivacyBadger screen on start. In general having less displayed automatically
on browser start is a good thing, and if you set this to `true`,
[PrivacyBadger] would greet you every browser start and I bet you would get
annoyed quickly.
- `"socialWidgetReplacementEnabled": true` Whether to display social media
embeds directly or replace them with a notice on how [PrivacyBadger] has
blocked them from tracking you with the menu options on what to do.
Now the only thing to do remains actually installing the extension.
**_BONUS!_**
[`"ExtensionManifestV2Availability": 2`](https://chromeenterprise.google/policies/#ExtensionManifestV2Availability)
will extend the time how long until ManifestV3 gets forced (and Google kills
content filters).
Anyway there is the same extension ID as before and four new options:
- `installation_mode` has options `normal_installed`, `force_installed` and
`blocked`. The first means it's installed by default, but the user can choose
to unload it, the second used here will prevent unloading the extension and
the third prevents installing and loading it entirely.
- Typing this I am not sure if `override_update_url` is actually required.
- `force_pinned` will pin the extension to Chromium toolbar by default and not
allow unpinning and moving it to the extension menu. I strongly recommend it
with content blockers, especially when there is site breakage as it makes it
so much easier to see at a glance when something is blocked. The other option
would be `default_unpinned`.
- `update_url` is required for automatically installed extensions and while here
it's the Chrome Web Store, it could as well be
`https://edge.microsoft.com/extensionwebstorebase/v1/crx` and although the IDs
are different there, they are again visible in the URL bar.
### `/etc/opt/chromium/policies/managed/aminda-extensions.json`
I hope I didn't scare you too badly by saying this isn't scary, but it's all
explained above.
```json
{
"3rdparty": {
"extensions": {
"cjpalhdlnbpafiamejdnhcphjbkeiagm": {
"toAdd": {
"trustedSiteDirectives": [
"chrome-extension-scheme",
"ecosia.org",
"moz-extension-scheme"
]
},
"toOverwrite": {
"filterLists": [
"user-filters",
"ublock-filters",
"ublock-badware",
"ublock-privacy",
"ublock-abuse",
"ublock-unbreak",
"easylist",
"easyprivacy",
"urlhaus-1",
"plowe-0",
"https://www.eff.org/files/effdntlist.txt",
"FIN-0",
"ublock-quick-fixes"
]
}
},
"ddkjiahejlhfcafbddmgiahcphecmpfh": {
"disableFirstRunPage": true
},
"pkehgijcmpdhfbdbbnkijodmdjhbjlgp": {
"checkForDNTPolicy": true,
"disabledSites": [
"chrome-extension-scheme",
"ecosia.org",
"moz-extension-scheme"
],
"learnInIncognito": true,
"learnLocally": true,
"sendDNTSignal": true,
"showCounter": true,
"showIntroPage": false,
"socialWidgetReplacementEnabled": true
}
}
},
"ExtensionManifestV2Availability": 2,
"cjpalhdlnbpafiamejdnhcphjbkeiagm": {
"installation_mode": "normal_installed",
"override_update_url": true,
"toolbar_pin": "force_pinned",
"update_url": "https://clients2.google.com/service/update2/crx"
},
"ddkjiahejlhfcafbddmgiahcphecmpfh": {
"installation_mode": "normal_installed",
"override_update_url": true,
"toolbar_pin": "force_pinned",
"update_url": "https://clients2.google.com/service/update2/crx"
},
"pkehgijcmpdhfbdbbnkijodmdjhbjlgp": {
"installation_mode": "force_installed",
"override_update_url": true,
"toolbar_pin": "force_pinned",
"update_url": "https://clients2.google.com/service/update2/crx"
}
}
```
_2024-06-04: I added uBlock Origin Lite here, see the questions and answers._
## Firefox
If you haven't read the previous blog post yet, please do that now as Firefox
forces everything to be in `/etc/firefox/policies.json` and thus this file will
begin by expanding the end result from there. And to not repeat myself, please
also read the Chromium section above as due to everything being webextensions,
the new part within extension configuration is the same.
Let's begin by what differs from Chromium:
- The extension ID is most easily readable from `about:support` instead of addon
URL.
- We can sideload the extension, although that won't affect Firefox sync.
- It's a lot easier to figure out what extension a block belongs to as the names
appear here.
- While there is no `ExtensionManifestV2Availability`, there are domains
protected by default (`extensions.webextensions.restrictedDomains`) that we
could unset.
_Oh meow, no more json!_ I am sorry.
```json
{
"policies": {
"3rdparty": {
"Extensions": {
"jid1-MnnxcxisBPnSXQ@jetpack": {
"checkForDNTPolicy": true,
"disabledSites": [
"challenges.cloudflare.com",
"chrome-extension-scheme",
"ecosia.org",
"moz-extension-scheme"
],
"learnInIncognito": true,
"learnLocally": true,
"sendDNTSignal": true,
"showCounter": true,
"showIntroPage": false,
"socialWidgetReplacementEnabled": true
},
"uBOLite@raymondhill.net": {
"disableFirstRunPage": true
},
"uBlock0@raymondhill.net": {
"toAdd": {
"trustedSiteDirectives": [
"chrome-extension-scheme",
"ecosia.org",
"firefox.com",
"mozilla.net",
"mozilla.org",
"moz-extension-scheme"
]
},
"toOverwrite": {
"filterLists": [
"user-filters",
"ublock-filters",
"ublock-badware",
"ublock-privacy",
"ublock-abuse",
"ublock-unbreak",
"easylist",
"easyprivacy",
"urlhaus-1",
"plowe-0",
"https://www.eff.org/files/effdntlist.txt",
"FIN-0",
"ublock-quick-fixes"
]
}
}
}
},
"DNSOverHTTPS": {
"Enabled": true,
"Fallback": false,
"Locked": true,
"ProviderURL": "https://dns.quad9.net/dns-query"
},
"DisableEncryptedClientHello": false,
"ExtensionSettings": {
"jid1-MnnxcxisBPnSXQ@jetpack": {
"install_url": "https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/downloads/latest/privacy-badger17/latest.xpi",
"installation_mode": "force_installed"
},
"uBOLite@raymondhill.net": {
"install_url": "https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/downloads/latest/ublock-origin-lite/latest.xpi",
"installation_mode": "normal_installed"
},
"uBlock0@raymondhill.net": {
"install_url": "https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/downloads/latest/ublock-origin/latest.xpi",
"installation_mode": "normal_installed"
}
},
"Preferences": {
"dom.block_download_insecure": {
"Status": "locked",
"Type": "boolean",
"Value": true
},
"dom.security.https_only_mode": {
"Status": "locked",
"Type": "boolean",
"Value": true
},
"extensions.webextensions.restrictedDomains": {
"Status": "user",
"Type": "string",
"Value": ""
}
}
}
}
```
Doesn't that look familiar? Yes, it's practically the same file [from
part Ⅰ]({% post_url blog/2024-05-17-https-everywhere %}#dns-over-https-1) and
the extensions took the exact same values as Chromium, only the IDs and download
locations changed and some Chromium extras disappeared.
Well, in uBlock Origin I did add the Mozilla/Firefox domains to avoid breakage
and in the end I removed the extra protection those sites would have from
extensions which would permit tracking by Mozilla. However, [PrivacyBadger]
would still protect from that while being less likely to break.
_Would you like to restore the protection for Mozilla pages? Replace the `user`
in `status` of `extensions.webextensions.restrictedDomains {}` with `clear` so
it will be restored to default value while `user` persists even if the lines are
removed as they appear as if the user had changed them in `about:config`._
_2024-06-04: I added uBlock Origin Lite here, see the questions and answers._
## Answers to potential questions
As I sometimes tend to be a bit controversial when balancing security, privacy,
digital carbon footprint and all, there are going to be questions and I keep
answering them otherwise too.
## Where can I see what policies extensions can take?
In Chromium `about:policies` has a checkbox "show unset policies" which will
bring a long list including the extensions. It also has a lovely search box.
### Why both PrivacyBadger and uBlock Origin?
I admit they have some overlap, but uBlock Origin relies on human made lists
instead of an algorhitm to block trackers (note that [PrivacyBadger] doesn't
even try to block ads, it happens by accident).
Additionally uBlock Origin does nothing about Instagram, Disqus, etc. widgets. I
could block JavaScript (which I do), but sometimes I will allow it to a website
anyway and then the widget learns I am there even if I had no interest in seeing
comments in that case. And if I wanted to allow them somewhere, I could click
"always allow this widget on this site".
I also love its ability to self-learn trackers, even if that may make me more
trackable. I think there are easier methods to track me (like my HTTP user-agent
saying I am on Windows, while my `navigator.useragent or `navigator.platform`
say something different) and Firefox Nightly is newer than most people use and
there are a countless of small things in browser fingerprinting, which could be
it's own blog post.
### Why EFF DNT allowlist?
I think I already answered this in the Chromium section, but I don't hate ads.
They may be important source of money to creators and I wouldn't mind some
financial support as well (if that wasn't practically illegal in Finland).
What I mind is targeted advertising, tracking, the potential for targeted
malvertising without it affecting anyone else and how they are used for
manipulation especially politically and with elections on discouraging some
people from voting.
### Where did uBlock Origin Lite come from?
I added it here on 2024-06-04 and set uBlock Origin to `normal_installed`
instead of `force_installed`, because I am worried about ManifestV2 extensions
not syncing as the majority probably won't have the policy to allow it
configured.
This gives the users the choice to use either of the two, both (which may be
discouraged) or neither, while PrivacyBadger is forced on and I think it may
perform better with ManifestV3 anyway considering the local learning feature,
which I consider essential for non-English content anyway.
Speaking of PrivacyBadger, other concerns I have with uBlock Origin Lite are:
1. I cannot allow non-tracking ads as I cannot add the EFF DNT allowlist. I
would need to convince the developer to add it, which I am not even going to
try, as it would go against the principle of the extension.
1. <del>I didn't get uBlock Origin Lite's `"noFiltering": [""]` policy working,
so I cannot pre-emptively handle broken captchas or allow Ecosia to show me
tracking ads in exchange of them planting trees.</del>. A day later I got
`"noFiltering": [""]` working, but it works like `toOverwrite` from uBlock
Origin, so any edits outside of the policy will reset upon restart. Then
again that may also be a feature, please do send your best regards to
Google...
Google only has themselves to blame for not thinking of the scenario where their
users might be ok with non-tracking ads and now have no option to allow them due
to being more concerned about malvertising than how advertising businesses are
doing, since they they ruined the compromise solution that tried to account
both.
I may trust myself to avoid malicious content online or that DNS filtering will
catch it, but I don't have such trust on my less technical family members.
I should also say that ManifestV3 and uBlock Origin Lite have good sides as
well, considering it not needing or requesting access to all pages visited out
of the box, so it may be more likely to pass organizational criterias and
actually get installed through policy.
### How do I enable more default lists in uBlock Origin?
As you saw, external blocklists are just matter of entering the URL into the
policy, but integrated ones are a bit more challenging. See the eye icon in
uBlock Origin dashboard? I have been pointing it and looking at the URL which
ends e.g. `/asset-viewer.html?url=fanboy-social` where `fanboy-social` would be
the list name.
More technical solution would be looking into the
[`assets/assets.json` file in uBlock Origin's GitHub repository](https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock/blob/master/assets/assets.json)
where the same names appear.
Remember that
[more filter lists make you more identifiable](https://browserleaks.com/proxy)
and _do as I say, not as I do_.
## What do you think about this blog post?
I feel a bit disappointed with it, I felt the previous one was more meaningful
and did everything better, but I hope this will be some benefit to someone
regardless or be something I can link to when I inevitably get asked these
questions again.
## Will there be browser policies part Ⅲ?
Honestly, I don't know. I was surprised part Ⅱ happened, although this is also
just scratching the tip of the iceberg and there is really a lot you can do with
browser policies.
### Where is all the futher reading?
If you have read both blog posts carefully, this one didn't actually say
anything new, it's all linked [from
part
Ⅰ]({% post_url blog/2024-05-17-https-everywhere %}#documentation-and-other-policies).
_[Obligatory changelog link](https://github.com/Mikaela/mikaela.github.io/commits/master/blog/_posts/2024-05-22-policy-contentblocker.md)_
[PrivacyBadger]: https://privacybadger.org
[AdNauseam]: https://adnauseam.io
Reference in New Issue View Git Blame Copy Permalink