Mikaela/mikaela.github.io
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/mikaela/mikaela.github.io/ synced 2024-11-26 06:19:33 +01:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Wiki Activity

ufw: transmission uses UDP for DHT

Browse Source 
Both are the same port number and this would be nice to be documented
somewhere.
This commit is contained in:
Aminda Suomalainen 2017-06-04 12:20:45 +03:00
parent d9e6ae1300
commit 7952fcf0cc
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: 0C207F07B2F32B67
1 changed files with 2 additions and 1 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

3
_posts/2015-06-12-ufw.md
View File

@ -56,7 +56,8 @@ ufw allow 60000:61000/udp
access to port only from specific addresses, only for devices that access to port only from specific addresses, only for devices that
aren't going anywhere and if IPv6 isn't cared about. (TODO: How to do aren't going anywhere and if IPv6 isn't cared about. (TODO: How to do
it IPv6? I have faint idea of UFW not supporting it). it IPv6? I have faint idea of UFW not supporting it).
* Transmission file transfer uses TCP. Default port: 51413. * Transmission file transfer uses TCP and DHT UDP. Default port for
both is: 51413. [Source](https://trac.transmissionbt.com/ticket/2265)
* 60000:61000 UDP/mosh — I feel this is the most insecure part of this * 60000:61000 UDP/mosh — I feel this is the most insecure part of this
setup and there should be something bettter instead of this. As setup and there should be something bettter instead of this. As
something evil could run and listen on these ports. something evil could run and listen on these ports.