From 7952fcf0cc83a6d43accb19a2b1faea388947a6b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Mikaela Suomalainen Date: Sun, 4 Jun 2017 12:20:45 +0300 Subject: [PATCH] ufw: transmission uses UDP for DHT Both are the same port number and this would be nice to be documented somewhere. --- _posts/2015-06-12-ufw.md | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/_posts/2015-06-12-ufw.md b/_posts/2015-06-12-ufw.md index 4226cc7..250072c 100644 --- a/_posts/2015-06-12-ufw.md +++ b/_posts/2015-06-12-ufw.md @@ -56,7 +56,8 @@ ufw allow 60000:61000/udp access to port only from specific addresses, only for devices that aren't going anywhere and if IPv6 isn't cared about. (TODO: How to do it IPv6? I have faint idea of UFW not supporting it). - * Transmission file transfer uses TCP. Default port: 51413. + * Transmission file transfer uses TCP and DHT UDP. Default port for + both is: 51413. [Source](https://trac.transmissionbt.com/ticket/2265) * 60000:61000 UDP/mosh — I feel this is the most insecure part of this setup and there should be something bettter instead of this. As something evil could run and listen on these ports.