Aminda Suomalainen
616785fc1f
I trust Privacy Badger to handle any potential trackers there and I especially suspect JavaScript blocking of breaking things. Besides they are very unlikely to be actively malicious. |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
policies.json | ||
README.md |
Firefox policies.json
The file is pretty self-explanatory, but I prefer Chromium way of handling enterprise policies since it allows me to cut them to multiple different files per whatever I am doing.
- WARNING TO LIBREWOLF USERS
- General warning
- Extensions
- Search engines
- Useful looking things for the future
- Things that look useful, but aren’t
WARNING TO LIBREWOLF USERS
This file takes priority over
/usr/share/librewolf/distribution/policies.json
so don’t
apply this or a lot of LibreWolf specific customizations stops being in
force.
General warning
This is meant for me and devices I maintain for self-dogfooding so
there are opinions. Including those Firefox won’t accept and will appear
as warnings or errors in about:config
depending on the
release channel or even all of them.
Extensions
They are mostly self-explanatory.
DuckDuckGo
jid1-ZAdIEUB7XOzOJw@jetpack
Although it’s not installed, I accidentally learned to manage it to tell it to shut up on install, because I know what is DuckDuckGo.
Privacy Badger
jid1-MnnxcxisBPnSXQ-eff@jetpack
- Downloaded directly from EFF.
Configured to learn locally and also in incognito as opposed to only relying on vendor list. Also not display the “Welcome to Privacy Badger screen”.
See also:
- https://github.com/EFForg/privacybadger/blob/master/doc/admin-deployment.md
- https://github.com/EFForg/privacybadger/blob/master/src/data/schema.json
Duplicate
- "jid1-MnnxcxisBPnSXQ-eff@jetpack": {
- "install_url": "https://www.eff.org/files/privacy-badger-latest.xpi",
+ "jid1-MnnxcxisBPnSXQ@jetpack": {
+ "install_url": "https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/downloads/latest/privacy-badger17/latest.xpi",
The EFF.org version won’t sync and if you sync with unmanaged computer, you will have two PrivacyBadgers. Congratulations?
Search engines
Policy SearchEngines is only allowed on ESR.
But who cares? Anyway thus DuckDuckGo extension is installed by default so when testing this policy I won’t have to see Google.
Additionally it’s a lie since at least Nightly reads it too without complaining.
Useful looking things for the future
Certificate installations
In the certificates
section
{
"Install": ["my_certificate_here.pem"]
}
Things that look useful, but aren’t
WebSiteFilter
{
"policies": {
"WebsiteFilter": {
"Block": ["<all_urls>"],
"Exceptions": ["http://example.org/*"]
}
}
}
Ok, nice, but my policy is already forcing AdNauseam which enforces my blocklist which is more practical.
Granted users can use private browsing mode to get past it, but I am not blocking actively malicious domains.