iwd & NetworkManager: clarify comments, note ManagementFrameProtection=1 being necessary for my home

This commit is contained in:
Aminda Suomalainen 2024-08-11 08:50:10 +03:00
parent 63a762c200
commit 5971eb9fd7
Signed by: Mikaela
SSH Key Fingerprint: SHA256:CXLULpqNBdUKB6E6fLA1b/4SzG0HvKD19PbIePU175Q
2 changed files with 8 additions and 1 deletions

View File

@ -8,7 +8,9 @@
[device]
wifi.backend=iwd
# Leave autoconnection logic and all for NetworkManager
# Leave autoconnection logic and all for NetworkManager. Without this I seem
# to not have fallback to other connections if the highest priority fails on
# ThinkPad T470 aka Lumina.
#wifi.iwd.autoconnect=true
wifi.iwd.autoconnect=false
# vim: filetype=NetworkManager.conf

View File

@ -33,6 +33,11 @@ AddressRandomizationRange=nic
# legacy networks and hardware! Switch to 1 (default) for only when supported
# by both sides (downgrade attack possible?).
ManagementFrameProtection=2
# It must be 1 for Lumina (ThinkPad T470) and MikroTik Chateau 5G to accept
# each other, otherwise fallback to open guest network happens.
#ManagementFrameProtection=1
# INSECURE NEVER USING MANAGEMENT FRAME PROTECTION!
#ManagementFrameProtection=0
[Network]
EnableIPv6=true