The signature is evidence that message comes from me. If I sign all my messages, I can say that I sign all my messages and possibly unsigned offensive content, which is spoofed to "come" from my address, isn't sent by me.
True, I could do that. But I don't have habit of writing offensive text and saying that it doesn't come from me.
Some people at IRC lsign keys of each other, so I am in somekind of trustweb.
The signature can still prove that the email hasn't been modified after sending.
This can change in the future. My key doesn't have any signatures right now, because anyone else near here doesn't use PGP.
According to "Locate assurer" feature at CAcert, the nearest assurer is 110KM away from me.
https://wiki.cacert.org/PgpSigning
Some mailing list software mess up with headers and make PGP/MIME signatures unverifiable.
Which mailing lists do that?
At least the following:
INLINE messages are easier to verify manually (presuming that charset doesn't cause problems).
K9 Mail doesn't support PGP/MIME.
This is the problem of your email client. If you use Thunderbird or Icedove or Seamonkey, you can probably install Enigmail and that signature block gets hidden. If you use some other email client, please report bug for that package in your distribution or upstream bug tracker.
And what does that have to do with INLINE signature? In PGP/MIME you would download the same mess, but inside signature.asc file.
Because I am fed up explaining myself on some mailing lists. This page will be linked in my email signature and I will ignore every question about things, which read on this page.
I want to raise awareness about PGP and that it's very easy to spoof emails from addresses of other people. As stated previously, I will also ignore claims like that.