From ab3794b886665600f24ddd2ad5902ce057289e74 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Aminda Suomalainen Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2025 11:08:16 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] n/dns.md: note DNS0 brownie points as another hand to overseas round-trip issue --- n/dns.md | 12 +++++++----- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/n/dns.md b/n/dns.md index 54b136c..71df23d 100644 --- a/n/dns.md +++ b/n/dns.md @@ -291,11 +291,13 @@ dig +short TXT whoami-ecs.v4.powerdns.org. In my experience [DNS0.eu] tends to have better filtering and [reporting options](https://www.dns0.eu/report) than [Quad9], while [servers being located only in](https://www.dns0.eu/network) the -[European Union](https://european-union.europa.eu) is mildly problematic when -your users start traveling outside it either for work or leisure, which across -continents tends to bring round-trips overseas. Additionally private ECS (see -above) tends to be bad poor for IPv6 and for very small AS like a school, it -directs to another side of the country, but that is a very minor issue. +[European Union](https://european-union.europa.eu) may either be free brownie +points on not sending DNS queries outside of the EU or mildly problematic when +your users start traveling outside the EU which which brings round-trips +overseas. Additionally private ECS (see above) tends to be bad poor for IPv6 and +for very small AS like a school, it directs to another side of the country, but +that is a very minor issue, as opposed to constantly being directed to another +country. Meanwhile [Quad9] blocking seems almost as good in [tests like this](https://techblog.nexxwave.eu/public-dns-malware-filters-tested-in-september-2024/)