From a246c4cb1d604024caafdcca7ccc5bcf1370790f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mikaela Suomalainen <mikaela.suomalainen@outlook.com>
Date: Sat, 5 May 2012 17:19:56 +0300
Subject: [PATCH] Clearsigning: Convert to markdown.

---
 Clearsigning.md | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 Clearsigning.md

diff --git a/Clearsigning.md b/Clearsigning.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..11ca64a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Clearsigning.md
@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
+Why do you GPG clearsign your emails instead of using PGP/MIME or something less spammy?
+========================================================================================
+
+I am clearsigning my emails instead of using PGP/MIME, because I am on 
+multiple mailing lists and most of them use mailing list software, 
+which messes up with headers and this way make PGP/MIME signatures 
+unverifiable.
+    
+But clearsigned signature looks ugly.
+=====================================
+    
+I know that clearsigned messages may look ugly to email clients, which
+don't support PGP, but they can at least be verified on all mailing lists.
+
+I am on slow connection and your signature is too big for me.
+=============================================================
+
+I am sorry for that. But keep in mind that your email client would stll
+download ther PGG/MIME signature (signature.asc) file even if I used
+PGP/MIME.