Mikaela/mikaela.github.io
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/mikaela/mikaela.github.io/ synced 2024-11-16 17:09:28 +01:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Wiki Activity

fix previous commit

Browse Source 
aargh!
This commit is contained in:
Aminda Suomalainen 2019-08-20 21:50:02 +03:00
parent 25e4e76d5a
commit 9282ff012e
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: 0C207F07B2F32B67
1 changed files with 2 additions and 2 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

4
pages/browser-extensions.markdown
View File

@ -72,13 +72,13 @@ Future note: [`network.dns.blockDotOnion;false`](https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/sh
* `network.trr.bootstrapAddress` DNS server to use for resolving the DoH * `network.trr.bootstrapAddress` DNS server to use for resolving the DoH
name, e.g. `149.112.112.112` (Resolver 2 of [Quad9](https://quad9.net)) name, e.g. `149.112.112.112` (Resolver 2 of [Quad9](https://quad9.net))
* `network.trr.mode` depends, 2 to prefer DoH, but fallback to system resolver (or 3 to enforce DoH without fallback). ***If there is system encrypted DNS, just take 1 to maybe benefit from eSNI while likely benefiting from system DNS cache without ESNI.*** * `network.trr.mode` depends, 2 to prefer DoH, but fallback to system resolver (or 3 to enforce DoH without fallback). ***If there is system encrypted DNS, just take 5 to at least benefit from the system DNS cache.***
* [DoH is required by Firefox ESNI support](https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1500289) which encrypts SNI which would still leak which * [DoH is required by Firefox ESNI support](https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1500289) which encrypts SNI which would still leak which
sites you visit. [Another bug about ESNI + Android DoT](https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1542754#c3) sites you visit. [Another bug about ESNI + Android DoT](https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1542754#c3)
* I have ended up to recommending 2 as otherwise the DoH server going * I have ended up to recommending 2 as otherwise the DoH server going
down stops DNS from working on your Firefox entirely, which may be down stops DNS from working on your Firefox entirely, which may be
more of a problem than unencrypted SNI as not everyone supports it. more of a problem than unencrypted SNI as not everyone supports it.
* since then I have decided that 1 is the best option, because otherwise it goes past ***my*** Unbound setup. I hope Mozilla/Firefox will fix the two bugs linked above, so I don't have to choose between DNS under my control vs encrypted SNI. * since then I have decided that 5 is the best option, because otherwise it goes past ***my*** Unbound setup. I hope Mozilla/Firefox will fix the two bugs linked above, so I don't have to choose between DNS under my control vs encrypted SNI.
* `network.trr.early-AAAA` `true` to hopefully prefer IPv6 * `network.trr.early-AAAA` `true` to hopefully prefer IPv6
* `network.trr.uri` for the actual resolver address, e.g. * `network.trr.uri` for the actual resolver address, e.g.
`https://dns.quad9.net/dns-query` or `https://149.112.112.112/dns-query` (removes the need for `network.trr.bootstrapAddress` and allows ǹetwork.trr.mode` `3`?) or `https://dns.quad9.net/dns-query` or `https://149.112.112.112/dns-query` (removes the need for `network.trr.bootstrapAddress` and allows ǹetwork.trr.mode` `3`?) or