From 766e5fbd088134d17752ba669e7c59b9d3043557 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Mikaela Suomalainen Date: Sat, 5 May 2012 17:33:15 +0300 Subject: [PATCH] Clearsigning.md: Make questions smaller. --- Clearsigning.md | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/Clearsigning.md b/Clearsigning.md index f2c8632..7d9d119 100644 --- a/Clearsigning.md +++ b/Clearsigning.md @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ Why do you GPG clearsign your emails instead of using PGP/MIME or something less spammy? -======================================================================================== +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I am clearsigning my emails instead of using PGP/MIME, because I am on multiple mailing lists and most of them use mailing list software, @@ -7,13 +7,13 @@ which messes up with headers and this way make PGP/MIME signatures unverifiable. But clearsigned signature looks ugly. -===================================== +------------------------------------- I know that clearsigned messages may look ugly to email clients, which don't support PGP, but they can at least be verified on all mailing lists. I am on slow connection and your signature is too big for me. -============================================================= +------------------------------------------------------------- I am sorry for that. But keep in mind that your email client would still download ther PGP/MIME signature (signature.asc) file even if I used