Mikaela/mikaela.github.io
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/mikaela/mikaela.github.io/ synced 2024-11-26 06:19:33 +01:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Wiki Activity

blog: Trying to be a better op

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Aminda Suomalainen 2015-06-11 11:54:19 +03:00
parent 1875143a45
commit 4f88d880fa
2 changed files with 58 additions and 0 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

57
_posts/2015-06-11-trying-to-be-better-op.md Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,57 @@
---
layout: post
comments: true
title: "Trying to be a better op"
category: [english]
tags: [english, irc]
---
*If ops are attacked, the channel is also hurt as much as if users were
attacked. Thus I am also taking action if op is attacked.*
Usually when I am op, it's easy to take action when someone else or some
user is attacked. When op is attacked and they take action, they are
"unable to handle criticism" or "abusing ops" or *anything like that here.*
From now, I will try to unlearn from that and be a better op at least on
channels that have clear (written or not) rules as on channels that don't,
there possibly no way to know what the ops are even supposed to do other
than look so scary that no one does anything bad.
There are only two issues that I see immediately now that I am typing this:
* What is an attack?
* What if it's not an attack and op makes a mistake?
The second is easy to answer, if there are multiple ops, the user affected
by the mistake can discuss about it with other ops present and/or the
other ops can revert whatever was done.
But there is still the question *what is an attack*?
Trying to analyze logs of the previous case this happened, it looks like
attack is at least:
* directly targeted to a person, not part of them, and not generally saying
that some part of them makes or doesn't make them X and neither it's
generally talking about that part and oneself own experiences of them.
* the *not*-parts still feel like attacks reading this, but other ops
say that it's assertiveness.
* talking about privilege for living in X where things are better and that
means that the attacked one cannot have any kinds of issues with anything
including mental health
* talking like the attacked one was attacking them
* *additions welcome*
Attack seems to also be when the attacked one communicates being
uncomfortable (which should be done clearly, but do they always remember
that) or when third party tells the people to calm down, but other party
still continues. I think the usual three warnings policy can be implemented
here.
Further reading would be the two policies from freenode and I currently
don't feel like commenting them further as my opinions are known.
* [Freenode's catalysts policy](https://freenode.net/catalysts.shtml)
* [Freenode's channel guidelines](https://freenode.net/channel_guidelines.shtml)

1
pages/irc.markdown
View File

@ -28,6 +28,7 @@ links.*
* [IRC over TLS is not pointless.]({% post_url 2015-04-22-IRC-over-TLS %})
* [Forming irc:// or ircs:// links]({% post_url 2015-05-18-ircs_links %})
* [Making channel secret or private]({% post_url 2015-06-08-private_secret_channels %})
* [Trying to be a better op: attacking op is no different from attacking user.]({% post_url 2015-06-11-trying-to-be-better-op %})
* Oper
* [Channels & Hostmask groups: A Basic howto]({% post_url 2015-01-10-channels-hostmask-groups-a-basic-howto %})
* [Stay away from Anope IRC Services]({% post_url 2015-03-12-stay-away-from-anope %})