46 lines
1.6 KiB
Markdown
Raw Normal View History

<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
<meta name="description" content="Insert description here" />
<meta name="keywords" content="Insert,keywords,here" />
<meta name="author" content="Mika Suomalainen" />
<meta charset="UTF-8" />
<link rel="canonical" href="http://mkaysi.github.com/articles/complaining/topposting.html">
<title>Top-posting in emails is annoying</title>
2012-09-16 17:52:14 +03:00
<link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="../../tyyli.css" />
</head>
2012-10-21 17:15:48 +03:00
<body>
<hr/>
[Sitemap](../../sitemap/sitemap.html)
<hr/>
2012-05-06 20:48:47 +03:00
Top-posting
===========
What is top-posting?
--------------------
Top posting is replying before the text which you are replying to (and which is usually automatically quoted by your email client).
This example from [Debian wiki](https://wiki.debian.org/FAQsFromDebianUser#What_is_top-posting_.28and_why_shouldn.27t_I_do_it.29.3F) answers to both, this and next question.
A: Because it messes up the way you read
Q: Why is top-posting bad?
A: Writing your answer before the question
Q: What is top-posting?
Why is it bad?
--------------
See the answer to the previous question.
It also makes harder to know what previous poster meant if he/she just said "+1" and other people have used different posting style and senders and replies are messed up. This happens often on Lubuntu mailing lists.
2012-05-06 20:48:47 +03:00
Rules
-----
At least [Debian mailing lists](http://www.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct) and [Ubuntu mailing lists](http://www.ubuntu.com/support/community/mailinglists) forbid top-posting in their guidelines. In my opinion other mailing lists should do this too.
2012-10-21 17:15:48 +03:00
</body>
</HTML>