mirror of https://github.com/Mikaela/Limnoria.git
Fixed some stuff in the FAQ and updated the DocBook version
This commit is contained in:
Daniel DiPaolo
parent
1f6f86aea7
commit
e271ea6a47
|
|
@ -36,7 +36,7 @@
|
|||
</question>
|
||||
<answer>
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
Because you're not given it anything to recognize you
|
||||
Because you've not given it anything to recognize you
|
||||
from! You'll need to identify with the bot
|
||||
(<botcommand>help identify</botcommand> to see how that
|
||||
works) or add your hostmask to your user record
|
||||
|
|
@ -98,7 +98,7 @@
|
|||
<dunk1> ;]
|
||||
<jemfinch|lambda> @load Enforcer
|
||||
<supybot> jemfinch|lambda: The operation succeeded.
|
||||
<jemfinch|lambda> @config supybot.plugins.Enforcer.autoOp.#supybot On
|
||||
<jemfinch|lambda> @config channel supybot.plugins.Enforcer.autoOp On
|
||||
<supybot> jemfinch|lambda: The operation succeeded.
|
||||
<jemfinch|lambda> ok, now cycle the channel (part and then rejoin)
|
||||
<– dunk1 (dunker@freebsd.nl) has left #supybot
|
||||
|
|
@ -130,6 +130,178 @@
|
|||
</para>
|
||||
</answer>
|
||||
</qandaentry>
|
||||
<qandaentry>
|
||||
<question>
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
Can Supybot do factoids?
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
</question>
|
||||
<answer>
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
Supybot most certainly can! In fact, we offer three
|
||||
full-fledged factoids-related plugins!
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
<plugin>Factoids</plugin> (written by
|
||||
<nick>jemfinch</nick>) is Supybot's original
|
||||
factoids-related plugin. It offers full integration with
|
||||
Supybot's nested commands as well as a complete 1:n key to
|
||||
factoid ratio, with lookup by individual number. Factoids
|
||||
also uses a channel-specific database instead of a global
|
||||
database though that's configurable with the
|
||||
<registrygroup>supybot.databases.plugins.channelSpecific</registrygroup>
|
||||
configuration variable.
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
<plugin>MoobotFactoids</plugin> (written by
|
||||
<nick>Strike</nick>) is much more full-featured, offering
|
||||
users the ability to define factoids in a slightly more
|
||||
user-friendly way, as well as parsing factoids to handle
|
||||
<reply>, <action>, and alternations (defining
|
||||
a factoid “test” as
|
||||
“<reply>(foo|bar|baz)” will make the bot
|
||||
send “foo” or “bar” or
|
||||
“baz” to the channel (without the normal
|
||||
“test is ” at the beginning)). If you're
|
||||
accustomed to Moobot's factoids or Blootbot's factoids,
|
||||
then this is the Factoids plugin for you. Unfortunately,
|
||||
due to the more natural definition syntax (required to be
|
||||
comaptible with Moobot) you can't define Factoids with
|
||||
nested commands; you'll have to evaluate the command first
|
||||
and then copy the result into your factoid definition.
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
<plugin>Infobot</plugin> (written by
|
||||
<nick>jamessan</nick>) is used for Infobot compatibility;
|
||||
if you still want the basic functionality of Infobot, this
|
||||
is the plugin to use.
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
</answer>
|
||||
</qandaentry>
|
||||
<qandaentry>
|
||||
<question>
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
Can I import my Infobot/Blootbot/Moobot factoids into
|
||||
Supybot?
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
</question>
|
||||
<answer>
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
As of present, we have no automated way to do so.
|
||||
<nick>Strike</nick> has written a few scripts for
|
||||
importing a Moobot database into MoobotFactoids, however,
|
||||
so you'll want to talk to him about helping you with that.
|
||||
We're certainly happy to help you convert such databases;
|
||||
if you can provide us with such a database exported to a
|
||||
flat file, we can probably do the rest of the work to
|
||||
write a script that imports it into a database for one of
|
||||
our factoids-related plugins.
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
</answer>
|
||||
</qandaentry>
|
||||
<qandaentry>
|
||||
<question>
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
Do I really have to use separate databases for each
|
||||
channel?
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
</question>
|
||||
<answer>
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
Of course not! We default to separate databases for each
|
||||
channel because, well, that's what <nick>jemfinch</nick>
|
||||
always thought was reasonable. Anyway, if you change the
|
||||
configuration variable
|
||||
<registrygroup>supybot.databases.plugins.channelSpecific</registrygroup>
|
||||
to <literal>False</literal> instead of
|
||||
<literal>True</literal>, for <emphasis>most</emphasis>
|
||||
databases, each channel will share the same database (the
|
||||
exceptions are <plugin>ChannelStats</plugin>,
|
||||
<plugin>Herald</plugin>, <plugin>Seen</plugin>, and
|
||||
<plugin>WordStats</plugin>, which are inherently rather
|
||||
channel-based).
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
</answer>
|
||||
</qandaentry>
|
||||
<qandaentry>
|
||||
<question>
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
Karma doesn't seem to work for me.
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
</question>
|
||||
<answer>
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
<plugin>Karma</plugin> by default doesn't acknowledge
|
||||
karma updates. If you check the karma of whatever you
|
||||
increased/decreased, you'll note that your increment or
|
||||
decrement still took place. If you'd rather
|
||||
<plugin>Karma</plugin> acknowledge karma updates, change
|
||||
the
|
||||
<registrygroup>supybot.plugins.Karma.response</registrygroup>
|
||||
configuration variable to <literal>On</literal>.
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
</answer>
|
||||
</qandaentry>
|
||||
<qandaentry>
|
||||
<question>
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
I added an alias, but it doesn't work!
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
</question>
|
||||
<answer>
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
Take a look at <botcommand>help <alias you
|
||||
added></botcommand>. If the alias the bot has listed
|
||||
doesn't match what you're giving it, chances re you need
|
||||
to quote your alias in order for the brackets not to be
|
||||
evaluated. For instance, if you're adding an alias to
|
||||
give you a link to your homepage, you need to say:
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
<ircsession>
|
||||
alias add mylink "format concat http://myhost.com/
|
||||
[urlquote $1]"
|
||||
</ircsession>
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
and not:
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
<ircsession>
|
||||
alias add mylink format concat http://myhost.com/
|
||||
[urlquote $1]
|
||||
</ircsession>
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
The first version works; the second version will always
|
||||
return the same url.
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
</answer>
|
||||
</qandaentry>
|
||||
<qandaentry>
|
||||
<question>
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
Is there a command that can tell me what capability
|
||||
another command requires?
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
</question>
|
||||
<answer>
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
No, there isn't, and there probably never will be.
|
||||
Commands have the flexibility to check any capabilities
|
||||
they wish to check; while this flexibility is useful, it
|
||||
also makes it hard to guess what capability a certain
|
||||
command requires. We could make a solution that would
|
||||
work in a large majority of cases, but it wouldn't (and
|
||||
couldn't!) be absolutely correct in all circumstances, and
|
||||
since we're anal and we hate doing things halfway, we
|
||||
probably won't ever add this partial solution.
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
Besides, is the error message so bad? If we did have such
|
||||
a command, many users would call the command, see that
|
||||
they could perform it, and then run the command, thus
|
||||
doubling the activity in the channel. Is that something
|
||||
you want?
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
</answer>
|
||||
</qandaentry>
|
||||
<qandaentry>
|
||||
<question>
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
|
|
@ -138,86 +310,8 @@
|
|||
</question>
|
||||
<answer>
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
You'll need to use the <plugin>Relay</plugin> plugin. As
|
||||
long as you don't call the <botcommand>relay
|
||||
join</botcommand> command, it won't actually do any
|
||||
relaying between channels (even if the bot is on the same
|
||||
channel on different networks). In order to use the Relay
|
||||
plugin, you'll want to first call the <botcommand>relay
|
||||
start</botcommand> command, followed by the
|
||||
<botcommand>relay connect</botcommand> command. These
|
||||
commands are (unfortunately) not persistent at this time,
|
||||
so you'll need to give them to the bot anytime you start
|
||||
it up. We'll probably have this lack of persistence
|
||||
rectified before the next release.
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
</answer>
|
||||
</qandaentry>
|
||||
<qandaentry>
|
||||
<question>
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
Can Supybot do factoids?
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
</question>
|
||||
<answer>
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
Supybot most certainly can! In fact, we offer two
|
||||
full-fledged factoids-related plugins!
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
<plugin>Factoids</plugin> (written by
|
||||
<nick>jemfinch</nick>) is Supybot's original
|
||||
factoids-related plugin. It offers full integration with
|
||||
Supybot's nested commands as well as a complete 1:n key to
|
||||
factoid ratio, with lookup by individual number.
|
||||
<plugin>Factoids</plugin> also uses a channel-specific
|
||||
database instead of a global database, although in the
|
||||
future it will likely be a configuration option whether to
|
||||
use channel-specific or global databases for such plugins.
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
<plugin>MoobotFactoids</plugin> (written by
|
||||
<nick>Strike</nick>) is much more full-featured, offering
|
||||
users the ability to define factoids in a slightly more
|
||||
user-friendly way, as well as parsing factoids to handle
|
||||
<reply>, <action>, "see", and alternations
|
||||
(defining a factoid "test" as "<reply>(foo|bar|baz)"
|
||||
will make the bot send "foo" or "bar" or "baz" to the
|
||||
channel (without the normal "test is " at the beginning)).
|
||||
If you're accustomed to Moobot's factoids or Blootbot's
|
||||
factoids, then this is the Factoids plugin for you.
|
||||
Unfortunately, due to the more natural definition syntax
|
||||
(required to be compatible with Moobot) you can't define
|
||||
Factoids with nested commands; you'll have to evaluate the
|
||||
command first and then copy the result into your factoid
|
||||
definition. <plugin>MoobotFactoids</plugin> uses a global
|
||||
database, so the factoids are the same for all channels.
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
In the future, we plan to have a compatibility plugin for
|
||||
Infobot, but as of present we've not yet written one.
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
</answer>
|
||||
</qandaentry>
|
||||
<qandaentry>
|
||||
<question>
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
Can I import my Infobot/Blootbot/Moobot factoids into
|
||||
Supybot?
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
</question>
|
||||
<answer>
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
As of present, we have no automated way to do so.
|
||||
<nick>Strike</nick> has written a few scripts for
|
||||
importing a Moobot database into
|
||||
<plugin>MoobotFactoids</plugin>, however, so you'll want
|
||||
to talk to him about helping you with that. We're
|
||||
certainly happy to help you convert such databases; if you
|
||||
can provide us with such a database exported to a flat
|
||||
file, we can probably do the rest of the work to write a
|
||||
script that imports it into a database for one of our
|
||||
factoids-related plugins.
|
||||
Just use the <botcommand>connect</botcommand> command in
|
||||
the <plugin>Owner</plugin> plugin. Easy as pie!
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
</answer>
|
||||
</qandaentry>
|
||||
|
|
@ -254,27 +348,8 @@
|
|||
log entry). We'd also like to see the commands that
|
||||
caused the bug, or happened around the time you saw the
|
||||
bug. If the bug involved a database, we'd love to see the
|
||||
database. Remember, it's always worse to send us too much
|
||||
information in a bug report than too little.
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
</answer>
|
||||
</qandaentry>
|
||||
<qandaentry>
|
||||
<question>
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
Karma doesn't seem to work for me.
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
</question>
|
||||
<answer>
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
<plugin>Karma</plugin> by default doesn't acknowledge
|
||||
karma updates. If you check the karma of whatever you
|
||||
increased/decreased, you'll note that your increment or
|
||||
decrement still took place. If you'd rather
|
||||
<plugin>Karma</plugin> acknowledge karma updates, change
|
||||
the
|
||||
<registrygroup>supybot.plugins.Karma.response</registrygroup>
|
||||
configuration variable to <literal>On</literal>.
|
||||
database. Remember, it's always worse to send us too
|
||||
little information in a bug report than too much.
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
</answer>
|
||||
</qandaentry>
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
5
docs/FAQ
5
docs/FAQ
|
|
@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ A: Supybot most certainly can! In fact, we offer three full-fledged
|
|||
MoobotFactoids (written by Strike) is much more full-featured,
|
||||
offering users the ability to define factoids in a slightly more
|
||||
user-friendly way, as well as parsing factoids to handle <reply>,
|
||||
<action>, "see", and altnerations (defining a factoid "test" as
|
||||
<action>, and alternations (defining a factoid "test" as
|
||||
"<reply>(foo|bar|baz)" will make the bot send "foo" or "bar" or
|
||||
"baz" to the channel (without the normal "test is " at the
|
||||
beginning)). If you're accustomed to Moobot's factoids or
|
||||
|
|
@ -86,8 +86,7 @@ A: Supybot most certainly can! In fact, we offer three full-fledged
|
|||
Unfortunately, due to the more natural definition syntax (required
|
||||
to be compatible with Moobot) you can't define Factoids with nested
|
||||
commands; you'll have to evaluate the command first and then copy
|
||||
the result into your factoid definition. MoobotFactoids uses a
|
||||
global database, so the factoids are the same for all channels.
|
||||
the result into your factoid definition.
|
||||
|
||||
Infobot (written by jamessan) is used for Infobot compatibility;
|
||||
if you still want the basic functionality of Infobot, this is the
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue