This is to prepare for multiple concurrent FT-over-DS action frames.
A list will be kept in netdev and for lookup reasons it needs to
parse the start of the frame to grab the aa/spa addresses. In this
call the IEs are also returned and passed to the new
ft_over_ds_parse_action_response.
For now the address checks have been moved into netdev, but this will
eventually turn into a queue lookup.
Prior to this, an error sending the FT Reassociation was treated
as fatal, which is correct for FT-over-Air but not for FT-over-DS.
If the actual l_genl_family_send call fails for FT-over-DS the
existing connection can be maintained and there is no need to
call netdev_connect_failed.
Adding a return to the tx_associate function works for both FT
types. In the FT-over-Air case this return will ultimately get
sent back up to auth_proto_rx_authenticate in which case will
call netdev_connect_failed. For FT-over-DS tx_associate is
actually called from the 'start' operation which can fail and
still maintain the existing connection.
FT-over-DS followed the same pattern as FT-over-Air which worked,
but really limited how the protocol could be used. FT-over-DS is
unique in that we can authenticate to many APs by sending out
FT action frames and parsing the results. Once parsed IWD can
immediately Reassociate, or do so at a later time.
To take advantage of this IWD need to separate FT-over-DS into
two stages: action frame and reassociation.
The initial action frame stage is started by netdev. The target
BSS is sent an FT action frame and a new cache entry is created
in ft.c. Once the response is received the entry is updated
with all the needed data to Reassociate. To limit the record
keeping on netdev each FT-over-DS entry holds a userdata pointer
so netdev doesn't need to maintain its own list of data for
callbacks.
Once the action response is parsed netdev will call back signalling
the action frame sequence was completed (either successfully or not).
At this point the 'normal' FT procedure can start using the
FT-over-DS auth-proto.
FT-over-DS is being separated into two independent stages. The
first of which is the processing of the action frame response.
This new class will hold all the parsed information from the action
frame and allowing it to be retrieved at a later time when IWD
needs to roam.
Initial info class should be created when the action frame is
being sent out. Once a response is received it can be parsed
with ft_over_ds_parse_action_response. This verifies the frame
and updates the ft_ds_info class with the parsed data.
ft_over_ds_prepare_handshake is the final step prior to
Reassociation. This sets all the stored IEs, anonce, and KH IDs
into the handshake and derives the new PTK.
The building of the FT IEs for Action/Authenticate
frames will need to be shared between ft and netdev
once FT-over-DS is refactored.
The building was refactored to work off the callers
buffer rather than internal stack buffers. An argument
'new_snonce' was included as FT-over-DS will generate
a new snonce for the initial action frame, hence the
handshakes snonce cannot be used.
FT-over-DS is a way to do a Fast BSS Transition using action frames for
the authenticate step. This allows a station to start a fast transition
to a target AP while still being connected to the original AP. This,
in theory, can result in less carrier downtime.
The existing ft_sm_new was removed, and two new constructors were added;
one for over-air, and another for over-ds. The internals of ft.c mostly
remain the same. A flag to distinguish between air/ds was added along
with a new parser to parse the action frames rather than authenticate
frames. The IE parsing is identical.
Netdev now just initializes the auth-proto differently depending on if
its doing over-air or over-ds. A new TX authenticate function was added
and used for over-ds. This will send out the IEs from ft.c with an
FT Request action frame.
The FT Response action frame is then recieved from the AP and fed into
the auth-proto state machine. After this point ft-over-ds behaves the
same as ft-over-air (associate to the target AP).
Some simple code was added in station.c to determine if over-air or
over-ds should be used. FT-over-DS can be beneficial in cases where the
AP is directing us to roam, or if the RSSI falls below a threshold.
It should not be used if we have lost communication to the AP all
(beacon lost) as it only works while we can still talk to the original
AP.
Since FT already handles processing the FT IE's (and building for
associate) it didn't make sense to have all the IE building inside
netdev_build_cmd_ft_authenticate. Instead this logic was moved into
ft.c, and an iovec is now passed from FT into
netdev_ft_tx_authenticate. This leaves the netdev command builder
unburdened by the details of FT, as well as prepares for FT-over-DS.
Since FT operates over Authenticate/Associate, it makes the most sense
for it to behave like the other auth-protos.
This change moves all the FT specific processing out of netdev and into
ft.c. The bulk of the changes were strait copy-pastes from netdev into
ft.c with minor API changes (e.g. remove struct netdev).
The 'in_ft' boolean unforunately is still required for a few reasons:
- netdev_disconnect_event relies on this flag so it can ignore the
disconnect which comes in when doing a fast transition. We cannot
simply check netdev->ap because this would cause the other auth-protos
to not handle a disconnect correctly.
- netdev_associate_event needs to correctly setup the eapol_sm when
in FT mode by setting require_handshake and use_eapol_start to false.
This cannot be handled inside eapol by checking the AKM because an AP
may only advertise a FT AKM, and the initial mobility association
does require the 4-way handshake.
Now the 'ft' module, previously ftutil, will be used to drive FT via
the auth-proto virtual class. This renaming is in preparation as
ftutil will become obsolete since all the IE building/processing is
going to be moved out of netdev. The new ft.c module will utilize
the existing ftutil functionality, but since this is now a full blown
auth protocol naming it 'ft' is better suited.
