802.11 mandates that IEs inside management frames are presented in a
given order. However, in the real world, many APs seem to ignore the
rules and send their IEs in seemingly arbitrary order, especially when
it comes to VENDOR tags. Change this function to no longer be strict in
enforcing the order.
Also, drop checking of rules specific to Probe Responses. These will
have to be handled separately (most likely by the AP module) since
802.11-2016, Section 11.1.4.3.5 essentially allows just about anything.
==25412==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: global-buffer-overflow on address 0x000000421ab0 at pc 0x000000402faf bp 0x7fffffffdb00 sp 0x7fffffffdaf0
READ of size 4 at 0x000000421ab0 thread T0
#0 0x402fae in validate_mgmt_ies src/mpdu.c:128
#1 0x403ce8 in validate_probe_request_mmpdu src/mpdu.c:370
#2 0x404ef2 in validate_mgmt_mpdu src/mpdu.c:662
#3 0x405166 in mpdu_validate src/mpdu.c:706
#4 0x402529 in ie_order_test unit/test-mpdu.c:156
#5 0x418f49 in l_test_run ell/test.c:83
#6 0x402715 in main unit/test-mpdu.c:171
#7 0x7ffff5d43ed9 in __libc_start_main (/lib64/libc.so.6+0x20ed9)
#8 0x4019a9 in _start (/home/denkenz/iwd-master/unit/test-mpdu+0x4019a9)
Validate the IE order for some of the cases. For other cases, as with
the Disassociation, Deauthentication and Action frame types in section
9.3 it's not even clear from the spec the fields are expected to be IEs
(in fact for Action frame we know they aren't). For the Shared Key
authentication type drop the union with the contents as they can be
easier parsed as an IE sequence. For SAE we are not expecting an IE
sequence apparently so this is where the union could come useful but
let's leave that until we want to support SAE.
Check the IE order for each frame type where we'd just do the body
minimum length check until now (and not always correctly). We do not
try to validate the contents of any IEs (may be doable for some) or the
minimum mandatory IEs presence. This is because which IEs are required
depend on the contents of other fields in the frame, on the
authentication state and STA config and even contents of a request frame
which we're validating the response to. Frame handlers have to do this
work anyway.
Declare the two missing frame subtype enum values for Action frames,
assume Action frames are valid. Once we have specific validation code
for any Action frames elsewhere, we can move it to mpdu_validate, but
right don't try to validate the frame body as there are many subtypes
and we don't use any of them except Neighbor Reports which are actually
really simple.
src/mpdu.c: In function ‘mpdu_validate’:
src/mpdu.c:180:9: error: ‘mmpdu’ may be used uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
mmpdu = (const struct mmpdu_header *) mmpdu;
^
Refactor management frame structures to take into account optional
presence of some parts of the header:
* drop the single structure for management header and body since
the body offset is variable.
* add mmpdu_get_body to locate the start of frame body.
* drop the union of different management frame type bodies.
* prefix names specific to management frames with "mmpdu" instead
of "mpdu" including any enums based on 802.11-2012 section 8.4.
* move the FC field to the mmpdu_header structure.
What comes in is a frame, and let's set it to uint8_t pointer, which is
semantically better than unsigned char.
Also, returning the cast pointer instead of a boolean is easier to
use as there won't be any need to perform the cast ourselves afterward
