tree-wide: correct the spelling Ghz -> GHz

This mispelling was present in the configuration, so I retained parsing
of the legacy BandModifier*Ghz options for compatibility. Without this
change anyone spelling GHz correctly in their configs would be very
confused.
This commit is contained in:
Ronan Pigott 2023-11-07 18:33:54 -07:00 committed by Denis Kenzior
parent 20f13184f2
commit c574c80e27
8 changed files with 23 additions and 19 deletions

2
TODO
View File

@ -286,7 +286,7 @@ Wireless daemon
- Support OCE mutually non-overlapping channels optimization.
OCE Section 3.10 mandates that the STA should scan channels 1, 6 and 11 in
the 2.4Ghz band first, unless it expects to find an AP on a different
the 2.4GHz band first, unless it expects to find an AP on a different
channel.
Priority: Low

View File

@ -2761,7 +2761,7 @@ static void print_wsc_configuration_error(unsigned int level, const char *label,
"Message timeout",
"Registration session timeout",
"Device Password Auth Failure",
"60 Ghz channel not supported",
"60 GHz channel not supported",
"Public Key Hash Mismatch",
};

View File

@ -1202,7 +1202,7 @@ static size_t ap_build_country_ie(struct ap_state *ap, uint8_t *out_buf,
* and use the same TX power. Any deviation from this results in a new
* channel group.
*
* TODO: 6Ghz requires operating triplets, not subband triplets.
* TODO: 6GHz requires operating triplets, not subband triplets.
*/
for (i = 0; i < len; i++) {
const struct band_freq_attrs *attr = &list[i];
@ -3564,7 +3564,7 @@ static bool ap_validate_band_channel(struct ap_state *ap)
freq = band_channel_to_freq(ap->channel, ap->band);
if (!freq) {
l_error("AP invalid band (%s) and channel (%u) combination",
(ap->band & BAND_FREQ_5_GHZ) ? "5Ghz" : "2.4GHz",
(ap->band & BAND_FREQ_5_GHZ) ? "5GHz" : "2.4GHz",
ap->channel);
return false;
}

View File

@ -122,7 +122,7 @@ The group ``[General]`` contains general settings.
- Value: rssi dBm value, from -100 to 1, default: **-70**
This value can be used to control how aggressively **iwd** roams when
connected to a 2.4Ghz access point.
connected to a 2.4GHz access point.
* - RoamThreshold5G
- Value: rssi dBm value, from -100 to 1, default: **-76**
@ -291,7 +291,7 @@ autoconnect purposes.
:widths: 20 80
:align: left
* - BandModifier2_4Ghz
* - BandModifier2_4GHz
- Values: floating point value (default: **1.0**)
Increase or decrease the preference for 2.4GHz access points by
@ -300,19 +300,19 @@ autoconnect purposes.
A value of 0.0 will disable the 2.4GHz band and prevent scanning or
connecting on those frequencies.
* - BandModifier5Ghz
* - BandModifier5GHz
- Values: floating point value (default: **1.0**)
Increase or decrease the preference for 5GHz access points by increasing
or decreasing the value of this modifier. 5GHz networks are already
preferred due to their increase throughput / data rate. However, 5GHz
networks are highly RSSI sensitive, so it is still possible for IWD to
prefer 2.4Ghz APs in certain circumstances.
prefer 2.4GHz APs in certain circumstances.
A value of 0.0 will disable the 5GHz band and prevent scanning or
connecting on those frequencies.
* - BandModifier6Ghz
* - BandModifier6GHz
- Values: floating point value (default: **1.0**)
Increase or decrease the preference for 6GHz access points by increasing

View File

@ -2333,24 +2333,28 @@ double scan_get_band_rank_modifier(enum band_freq band)
{
const struct l_settings *config = iwd_get_config();
double modifier;
char *str;
char *str, *str_legacy;
switch (band) {
case BAND_FREQ_2_4_GHZ:
str = "BandModifier2_4Ghz";
str = "BandModifier2_4GHz";
str_legacy = "BandModifier2_4Ghz";
break;
case BAND_FREQ_5_GHZ:
str = "BandModifier5Ghz";
str = "BandModifier5GHz";
str_legacy = "BandModifier5Ghz";
break;
case BAND_FREQ_6_GHZ:
str = "BandModifier6Ghz";
str = "BandModifier6GHz";
str_legacy = "BandModifier6Ghz";
break;
default:
l_warn("Unhandled band %u", band);
return 0.0;
}
if (!l_settings_get_double(config, "Rank", str, &modifier))
if (!l_settings_get_double(config, "Rank", str, &modifier) &&
!l_settings_get_double(config, "Rank", str_legacy, &modifier))
modifier = 1.0;
return modifier;

View File

@ -4435,7 +4435,7 @@ static void station_wiphy_watch(struct wiphy *wiphy,
/*
* The only state that requires special handling is for
* quick scans since the previous quick scan was delayed until
* the regulatory domain updated. Try again in case 6Ghz is now
* the regulatory domain updated. Try again in case 6GHz is now
* unlocked (unlikely), or advance to full autoconnect. Just in
* case this update came during a quick scan, ignore it.
*/

View File

@ -1262,10 +1262,10 @@ static void wiphy_print_basic_info(struct wiphy *wiphy)
l_info("\tPermanent Address: "MAC, MAC_STR(wiphy->permanent_addr));
if (wiphy->band_2g)
wiphy_print_band_info(wiphy->band_2g, "2.4Ghz Band");
wiphy_print_band_info(wiphy->band_2g, "2.4GHz Band");
if (wiphy->band_5g)
wiphy_print_band_info(wiphy->band_5g, "5Ghz Band");
wiphy_print_band_info(wiphy->band_5g, "5GHz Band");
if (wiphy->band_6g)
wiphy_print_band_info(wiphy->band_6g, "6GHz Band");

View File

@ -654,8 +654,8 @@ static void test_conversions(const void *data)
{
/*
* Test a few invalid channels/frequencies that appear valid but are
* not in the E-4 table. The checks in band.c seem to cover 2.4Ghz and
* 6Ghz very well since there are no gaps, but the 5GHz band has some
* not in the E-4 table. The checks in band.c seem to cover 2.4GHz and
* 6GHz very well since there are no gaps, but the 5GHz band has some
* segmentation.
*/