3
0
mirror of https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/network/wireless/iwd.git synced 2024-11-22 23:09:34 +01:00

ie: scan: use HT rates in scan ranking

This adds HT IE parsing and data rate calculation for HT (80211n)
rates. Now, a BSS supporting HT rates will be ranked higher than
a basic rate BSS, assuming the RSSI is at an acceptable level.
This commit is contained in:
James Prestwood 2019-02-22 16:43:44 -08:00 committed by Denis Kenzior
parent 5ce6e173ba
commit ad2bf340a4
4 changed files with 242 additions and 9 deletions

218
src/ie.c
View File

@ -1491,6 +1491,224 @@ int ie_parse_supported_rates_from_data(const uint8_t *supp_rates_ie,
rssi, data_rate);
}
enum ht_vht_channel_width {
HT_VHT_CHANNEL_WIDTH_20MHZ = 0,
HT_VHT_CHANNEL_WIDTH_40MHZ,
HT_VHT_CHANNEL_WIDTH_80MHZ,
HT_VHT_CHANNEL_WIDTH_160MHZ,
};
/*
* Base RSSI values for 20MHz (both HT and VHT) channel. These values can be
* used to calculate the minimum RSSI values for all other channel widths. HT
* MCS indexes are grouped into ranges of 8 (per spatial stream) where VHT are
* grouped in chunks of 10. This just means HT will not use the last two
* index's of this array.
*/
static const int32_t ht_vht_base_rssi[] = {
-82, -79, -77, -74, -70, -66, -65, -64, -59, -57
};
struct ht_vht_rate {
uint64_t rate;
uint64_t sgi_rate;
};
static const struct ht_vht_rate ht_vht_rates[] = {
[HT_VHT_CHANNEL_WIDTH_20MHZ] = { .rate = 6500000,
.sgi_rate = 7200000 },
[HT_VHT_CHANNEL_WIDTH_40MHZ] = { .rate = 13500000,
.sgi_rate = 15000000 },
[HT_VHT_CHANNEL_WIDTH_80MHZ] = { .rate = 29300000,
.sgi_rate = 32500000 },
[HT_VHT_CHANNEL_WIDTH_160MHZ] = { .rate = 58500000,
.sgi_rate = 65000000 },
};
/*
* Both HT and VHT rates are calculated in the same fashion. The only difference
* is a relative MCS index is used for HT since, for each NSS, the formula
* is the same with relative index's. This is why this is called with index % 8
* for HT, but not VHT.
*/
static bool calculate_ht_vht_data_rate(uint8_t index,
enum ht_vht_channel_width width,
int32_t rssi, uint8_t nss, bool sgi,
uint64_t *data_rate)
{
const struct ht_vht_rate *rate = &ht_vht_rates[width];
int32_t width_adjust = width * 3;
if (rssi < ht_vht_base_rssi[index] + width_adjust)
return false;
if (sgi)
*data_rate = rate->sgi_rate;
else
*data_rate = rate->rate;
/* adjust base for spatial streams */
*data_rate *= nss;
/*
* As with HT, the VHT rates multiplier jumps up
* by 2 after MCS index 4
*/
if (index < 4)
*data_rate *= index + 1;
else
*data_rate *= index + 3;
return true;
}
static int ie_parse_ht_capability(struct ie_tlv_iter *iter, int32_t rssi,
uint64_t *data_rate)
{
unsigned int len;
const uint8_t *data;
uint8_t ht_cap;
int i;
uint64_t highest_rate = 0;
bool support_40mhz;
bool short_gi_20mhz;
bool short_gi_40mhz;
len = ie_tlv_iter_get_length(iter);
if (len < 26)
return -EINVAL;
if (ie_tlv_iter_get_tag(iter) != IE_TYPE_HT_CAPABILITIES)
return -EINVAL;
data = ie_tlv_iter_get_data(iter);
/* Parse out channel width set and short GI */
ht_cap = l_get_u8(data++);
support_40mhz = util_is_bit_set(ht_cap, 1);
short_gi_20mhz = util_is_bit_set(ht_cap, 5);
short_gi_40mhz = util_is_bit_set(ht_cap, 6);
data += 2;
/*
* TODO: Support MCS values 32 - 76
*
* The MCS values > 31 do not follow the same pattern since they use
* unequal modulation per spatial stream. These higher MCS values
* actually don't follow a pattern at all, since each stream can have a
* different modulation a higher MCS value does not mean higher
* throughput. For this reason these MCS indexes are left out.
*/
for (i = 31; i >= 0; i--) {
uint64_t drate;
uint8_t byte = i / 8;
uint8_t bit = i % 8;
if (!util_is_bit_set(data[byte], bit))
continue;
if (!support_40mhz)
goto check_20;
if (calculate_ht_vht_data_rate(i % 8,
HT_VHT_CHANNEL_WIDTH_40MHZ,
rssi, (i / 8) + 1,
short_gi_40mhz, &drate)) {
*data_rate = drate;
return 0;
}
check_20:
if (!calculate_ht_vht_data_rate(i % 8,
HT_VHT_CHANNEL_WIDTH_20MHZ,
rssi, (i / 8) + 1,
short_gi_20mhz, &drate))
continue;
if (!support_40mhz) {
*data_rate = drate;
return 0;
}
if (drate > highest_rate)
highest_rate = drate;
}
if (!highest_rate)
return -ENOTSUP;
*data_rate = highest_rate;
return 0;
}
static int ie_parse_ht_capability_from_data(const uint8_t *data, uint8_t len,
int32_t rssi, uint64_t *data_rate)
{
struct ie_tlv_iter iter;
uint8_t tag;
ie_tlv_iter_init(&iter, data, len);
if (!ie_tlv_iter_next(&iter))
return -EMSGSIZE;
tag = ie_tlv_iter_get_tag(&iter);
if (tag != IE_TYPE_HT_CAPABILITIES)
return -EPROTOTYPE;
return ie_parse_ht_capability(&iter, rssi, data_rate);
}
/*
* Calculates the theoretical maximum data rates out of the provided
* supported rates IE, HT IE, and VHT IE. All 3 parsing functions are allowed
* to return -ENOTSUP, which indicates that a data rate was not found given
* the provided data. This is not fatal, it most likely means our RSSI was too
* low.
*/
int ie_parse_data_rates(const uint8_t *supp_rates_ie,
const uint8_t *ext_supp_rates_ie,
const uint8_t *ht_ie,
int32_t rssi,
uint64_t *data_rate)
{
int ret = -ENOTSUP;
uint64_t rate = 0;
/* An RSSI this low will not yield any rate results */
if (rssi < -82)
return -ENOTSUP;
if (ht_ie) {
ret = ie_parse_ht_capability_from_data(ht_ie, IE_LEN(ht_ie),
rssi, &rate);
if (ret == 0)
goto done;
}
if (supp_rates_ie || ext_supp_rates_ie) {
ret = ie_parse_supported_rates_from_data(supp_rates_ie,
IE_LEN(supp_rates_ie),
ext_supp_rates_ie,
IE_LEN(supp_rates_ie),
rssi, &rate);
if (ret == 0)
goto done;
}
return ret;
done:
*data_rate = rate;
return 0;
}
int ie_parse_mobility_domain(struct ie_tlv_iter *iter, uint16_t *mdid,
bool *ft_over_ds, bool *resource_req)
{

View File

@ -419,6 +419,12 @@ int ie_parse_supported_rates_from_data(const uint8_t *supp_rates_ie,
uint8_t ext_supp_rates_len,
int32_t rssi, uint64_t *data_rate);
int ie_parse_data_rates(const uint8_t *supp_rates_ie,
const uint8_t *ext_supp_rates_ie,
const uint8_t *ht_ie,
int32_t rssi,
uint64_t *data_rate);
int ie_parse_mobility_domain(struct ie_tlv_iter *iter, uint16_t *mdid,
bool *ft_over_ds, bool *resource_req);
int ie_parse_mobility_domain_from_data(const uint8_t *data, uint8_t len,

View File

@ -865,6 +865,14 @@ static bool scan_parse_bss_information_elements(struct scan_bss *bss,
bss->cc[2] = iter.data[2];
bss->cc_present = true;
break;
case IE_TYPE_HT_CAPABILITIES:
if (iter.len != 26)
return false;
bss->ht_capable = true;
memcpy(bss->ht_ie, iter.data - 2, iter.len + 2);
break;
}
}
@ -1049,20 +1057,19 @@ static void scan_bss_compute_rank(struct scan_bss *bss)
if (bss->has_sup_rates || bss->ext_supp_rates_ie) {
uint64_t data_rate;
if (ie_parse_supported_rates_from_data(bss->has_sup_rates ?
if (ie_parse_data_rates(bss->has_sup_rates ?
bss->supp_rates_ie : NULL,
IE_LEN(bss->supp_rates_ie),
bss->ext_supp_rates_ie,
IE_LEN(bss->ext_supp_rates_ie),
bss->ht_capable ? bss->ht_ie : NULL,
bss->signal_strength / 100,
&data_rate) == 0) {
double factor = RANK_MAX_SUPPORTED_RATE_FACTOR -
RANK_MIN_SUPPORTED_RATE_FACTOR;
/*
* Maximum rate is 54 Mbps
* Maximum rate is 600 Mbps (HT)
*/
factor = factor * data_rate / 54000000 +
factor = factor * data_rate / 600000000 +
RANK_MIN_SUPPORTED_RATE_FACTOR;
rank *= factor;
} else

View File

@ -59,10 +59,12 @@ struct scan_bss {
uint8_t utilization;
uint8_t cc[3];
uint16_t rank;
uint8_t ht_ie[28];
bool mde_present : 1;
bool cc_present : 1;
bool cap_rm_neighbor_report : 1;
bool has_sup_rates : 1;
bool ht_capable : 1;
};
struct scan_parameters {