3
0
mirror of https://github.com/ergochat/ergo.git synced 2024-11-25 05:19:25 +01:00
ergo/vendor/github.com/tidwall/btree
Shivaram Lingamneni fd3cbab6ee bump buntdb to v1.2.3
Potentially fixes the database corruption seen on #1603
2021-04-01 20:45:15 -04:00
..
btree.go bump buntdb to v1.2.3 2021-04-01 20:45:15 -04:00
LICENSE upgrade buntdb and dependencies 2020-11-08 17:55:22 -05:00
README.md bump buntdb to v1.2.3 2021-04-01 20:45:15 -04:00

btree

GoDoc

An efficient B-tree implementation in Go.

Features

  • Copy() method with copy-on-write support.
  • Fast bulk loading for pre-ordered data using the Load() method.
  • All operations are thread-safe.
  • Path hinting optimization for operations with nearby keys.

Installing

To start using btree, install Go and run go get:

$ go get -u github.com/tidwall/btree

Usage

package main

import (
    "fmt"

    "github.com/tidwall/btree"
)

type Item struct {
    Key, Val string
}

// byKeys is a comparison function that compares item keys and returns true
// when a is less than b.
func byKeys(a, b interface{}) bool {
    i1, i2 := a.(*Item), b.(*Item)
    return i1.Key < i2.Key
}

// byVals is a comparison function that compares item values and returns true
// when a is less than b.
func byVals(a, b interface{}) bool {
    i1, i2 := a.(*Item), b.(*Item)
    if i1.Val < i2.Val {
        return true
    }
    if i1.Val > i2.Val {
        return false
    }
    // Both vals are equal so we should fall though
    // and let the key comparison take over.
    return byKeys(a, b)
}

func main() {
    // Create a tree for keys and a tree for values.
    // The "keys" tree will be sorted on the Keys field.
    // The "values" tree will be sorted on the Values field.
    keys := btree.New(byKeys)
    vals := btree.New(byVals)

    // Create some items.
    users := []*Item{
        &Item{Key: "user:1", Val: "Jane"},
        &Item{Key: "user:2", Val: "Andy"},
        &Item{Key: "user:3", Val: "Steve"},
        &Item{Key: "user:4", Val: "Andrea"},
        &Item{Key: "user:5", Val: "Janet"},
        &Item{Key: "user:6", Val: "Andy"},
    }

    // Insert each user into both trees
    for _, user := range users {
        keys.Set(user)
        vals.Set(user)
    }

    // Iterate over each user in the key tree
    keys.Ascend(nil, func(item interface{}) bool {
        kvi := item.(*Item)
        fmt.Printf("%s %s\n", kvi.Key, kvi.Val)
        return true
    })

    fmt.Printf("\n")
    // Iterate over each user in the val tree
    vals.Ascend(nil, func(item interface{}) bool {
        kvi := item.(*Item)
        fmt.Printf("%s %s\n", kvi.Key, kvi.Val)
        return true
    })

    // Output:
    // user:1 Jane
    // user:2 Andy
    // user:3 Steve
    // user:4 Andrea
    // user:5 Janet
    // user:6 Andy
    //
    // user:4 Andrea
    // user:2 Andy
    // user:6 Andy
    // user:1 Jane
    // user:5 Janet
    // user:3 Steve
}

Operations

Basic

Len()                   # return the number of items in the btree
Set(item)               # insert or replace an existing item
Get(item)               # get an existing item
Delete(item)            # delete an item

Iteration

Ascend(pivot, iter)     # scan items in ascending order starting at pivot.
Descend(pivot, iter)    # scan items in descending order starting at pivot.

Queues

Min()                   # return the first item in the btree
Max()                   # return the last item in the btree
PopMin()                # remove and return the first item in the btree
PopMax()                # remove and return the last item in the btree

Bulk loading

Load(item)              # load presorted items into tree

Path hints

SetHint(item, *hint)    # insert or replace an existing item
GetHint(item, *hint)    # get an existing item
DeleteHint(item, *hint) # delete an item

Performance

This implementation was designed with performance in mind.

The following benchmarks were run on my 2019 Macbook Pro (2.4 GHz 8-Core Intel Core i9) using Go 1.15.3. The items are simple 8-byte ints.

** sequential set **
google:  set-seq        1,000,000 ops in 160ms, 6,262,097/sec, 159 ns/op, 31.0 MB, 32 bytes/op
tidwall: set-seq        1,000,000 ops in 142ms, 7,020,721/sec, 142 ns/op, 36.6 MB, 38 bytes/op
tidwall: set-seq-hint   1,000,000 ops in 87ms, 11,503,315/sec, 86 ns/op, 36.6 MB, 38 bytes/op
tidwall: load-seq       1,000,000 ops in 37ms, 27,177,242/sec, 36 ns/op, 36.6 MB, 38 bytes/op
go-arr:  append         1,000,000 ops in 49ms, 20,574,760/sec, 48 ns/op

** random set **
google:  set-rand       1,000,000 ops in 606ms, 1,649,921/sec, 606 ns/op, 21.5 MB, 22 bytes/op
tidwall: set-rand       1,000,000 ops in 543ms, 1,841,590/sec, 543 ns/op, 26.7 MB, 27 bytes/op
tidwall: set-rand-hint  1,000,000 ops in 573ms, 1,745,624/sec, 572 ns/op, 26.4 MB, 27 bytes/op
tidwall: set-again      1,000,000 ops in 452ms, 2,212,581/sec, 451 ns/op, 27.1 MB, 28 bytes/op
tidwall: set-after-copy 1,000,000 ops in 472ms, 2,117,457/sec, 472 ns/op, 27.9 MB, 29 bytes/op
tidwall: load-rand      1,000,000 ops in 551ms, 1,816,498/sec, 550 ns/op, 26.1 MB, 27 bytes/op

** sequential get **
google:  get-seq        1,000,000 ops in 133ms, 7,497,604/sec, 133 ns/op
tidwall: get-seq        1,000,000 ops in 110ms, 9,082,972/sec, 110 ns/op
tidwall: get-seq-hint   1,000,000 ops in 55ms, 18,289,945/sec, 54 ns/op

** random get **
google:  get-rand       1,000,000 ops in 149ms, 6,704,337/sec, 149 ns/op
tidwall: get-rand       1,000,000 ops in 131ms, 7,616,296/sec, 131 ns/op
tidwall: get-rand-hint  1,000,000 ops in 216ms, 4,632,532/sec, 215 ns/op

You can find the benchmark utility at tidwall/btree-benchmark

Contact

Josh Baker @tidwall

License

Source code is available under the MIT License.